Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Input enhancement and L2 grammatical development: What the research reveals
|Title:||Input enhancement and L2 grammatical|
development: What the research reveals
|Authors:||Leow, Ronald P.|
|Date Issued:||01 Jan 2008|
|Publisher:||Heinle Cengage Learning|
|Citation:||Leow, R.P. (2008). Input enhancement and L2 grammatical|
development: What the research reveals. The American Association of University Supervisors, Coordinators and Directors of Foreign Languages Programs (AAUSC), 16-34. http://hdl.handle.net/102015/69655
|Abstract:||The role of input enhancement (IE; Sharwood Smith, 1991, 1993) in L2 grammatical development remains a controversial issue in the SLA field.Adding to the inconclusive findings is the broad definition of the term “input enhancement” found in the SLA literature and the various methodological approaches|
taken to its operationalization and measurement. On the one hand, some instructional strands of research appear to share Sharwood Smith’s broadest definition of input enhancement, which conflates the independent variable
enhancement with other instructional independent variables. On the other
hand, other strands of research methodologically tease out the variable enhancement and compare the effects of this variable to its absence on L2 development. This chapter examines these two substrands coexisting within the concept of input enhancement to provide a clearer picture of the role of input enhancement in L2 grammatical development. More specifically, the chapter critically assesses Sharwood Smith’s concept of input enhancement, which appears to have undergone a theoretical change from its original notion of consciousness-
raising in relation to the role of awareness in his postulation and also
a change from a product to a process perspective. It also critically evaluates
separately the two substrands, placing a strong emphasis on the research
methodologies employed in these studies in relation to their internal and external validities; it then compares the differences between these substrands. Finally, the chapter provides informed suggestions, based on the appropriate
robustness of research findings, that teachers may wish to consider to understand and evaluate the potential contribution that input enhancement may have regarding learners’ L2 grammatical development.
|Appears in Collections:||
2008 CONCEPTIONS OF L2 GRAMMAR: THEORETICAL APPROACHES AND THEIR APPLICATION IN THE L2 CLASSROOM|
Please email firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.