Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Online Asynchronous Discussion Boards. Busywork or Beneficial?

File Size Format  
2020-Ringler.pdf 173.57 kB Adobe PDF View/Open

Item Summary

Title:Online Asynchronous Discussion Boards. Busywork or Beneficial?
Authors:Schubert, Carol
Glassman, Aaron
Ringler, Ilene
Author Affiliation:Carol Schubert - Purdue University Global
Aaron Glassman - Embry Riddle University
Ilene Ringler - Purdue University Global
Date Issued:2020
Abstract:Asynchronous and blended learning venues are experiencing rapid growth worldwide. Research which provides data to support student success in the increasing sector of online and blended delivery venues can be invaluable for students, course developers and instructors. A mixedmethods survey was sent to all Business students at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (Worldwide) in both graduate and undergraduate programs. There were 513 usable responses that contained rich data about student perceptions of online discussions boards. Elements evaluated include faculty engagement, student engagement, overall activity value, good and bad practices, as well as student engagement preferences and naming conventions. Statistical analysis and text mining were performed to identify relationships and trends in the qualitative and quantitative data. The results indicated that students find value in online discussion boards although they do not accurately replicate a traditional classroom discussion. Many additional components of good and bad discussion board practices were discovered.
Pages/Duration:10 pages
Rights:Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Appears in Collections: TCC 2020 Proceedings

Please email if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.