Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
L2 Learning-To-Write Through Writing Conferences: A Mixed Methods Research Study
|Title:||L2 Learning-To-Write Through Writing Conferences: A Mixed Methods Research Study|
|Contributors:||Brown, James Dean (advisor)|
Second Language Studies (department)
|Keywords:||English as a second language|
show 4 moresecond language acquisition
second language writing
|Publisher:||University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa|
|Abstract:||A writing conference (WrC) is a one-on-one consulting session concerning a student’s written academic work that takes place in a novice–expert pair. The literature on second language (L2) WrCs commonly addresses issues such as how novice writers learn to write, writers’ communicative responsibilities, and the challenges involved in L2 WrCs (e.g., Cumming & So, 1996; Ewert, 2009; Patthey-Chavez & Ferris, 1997; Young & Miller, 2004). L2 writing research has identified conditions that lead to successful textual revisions by coding texts, while conference studies have illustrated dominance and miscommunication in WrC talk by analyzing discursive practices. Yet these approaches are rarely employed together to understand data from the same participants and contexts, and most studies have been conducted on a small scale. |
To understand the effectiveness, meaningfulness, and challenges of L2 WrCs, I introduced WrCs in a college-level English for Academic Purpose (EAP) program in Hawai‘i. Employing a sequential explanatory mixed-methods research design (Creswell, 2009), I collected pre and post questionnaires and essays from 108 learners. Over the course of the semester, 33 student–tutor pairs met for WrCs outside of regular EAP class times. I video recorded the WrCs, collected the students’ drafts and revisions, and conducted playback interviews with each participant. I statistically compared the quality of the students’ texts and attitudes, coded the topics discussed, discourse structures, and revision types, and explored the participants’ performances qualitatively. While the findings of the quantitative analysis indicate marginal effectiveness of L2 WrCs, the coding analysis demonstrates the diversity of the participants’ engagement in the WrCs. Qualitative analysis of selected WrCs illustrates the active participation and scaffolding that occurred in individual sessions, shows the interactive structure of the WrCs, and validates quantitative and coding results. Finally, the study explores the convergence and divergence of the findings from the different analyses, allowing a mixed-methods interpretation that casts new light on WrCs and L2 learning-to-write. Pedagogically, this study addresses the following matters: (a) whether WrCs are useful, (b) whether L2 learners should attend WrCs, (c) what learners and their tutors discuss during WrCs, and (d) how learners and tutors participate in WrCs.
|Rights:||All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.|
|Appears in Collections:||
Ph.D. - Second Language Studies|
Please email email@example.com if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.