Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Familiarity Bias and the Propensity to Issue Going Concern Opinions

File Size Format  
HARC 2020 paper 252.pdf 395.4 kB Adobe PDF View/Open

Item Summary

Title:Familiarity Bias and the Propensity to Issue Going Concern Opinions
Authors:Tiffany Westfall
Douglas Ayres
Keywords:Familiarity bias
Going concern
Internal control weaknesses
Auditor judgment
Date Issued:31 Aug 2019
Abstract:This study examines the association between familiarity bias and audit firm judgements using going concern opinion modifications. We conjecture that familiarity bias is highest when an audit firm is least familiar with its clients. We measure familiarity bias using auditor changes because familiarity bias is likely to be the highest on the initial year of an audit relationship. We find the propensity to issue a going concern modification to be much higher during this initial period, even after controlling for a multitude of factors known to be determinants of going concern modifications. Our findings also suggest the phenomenon appears to slowly dissipate over a five-year auditor client tenure. Supporting our theoretical prediction, further results find that as the auditor is more familiar with the client’s industry (e.g. industry expertise) the main effect is moderated. Our results are also strongest when the successor auditor is located in a different locale than the previous auditor, situations leading an even more pronounced lack of familiarity. We also examine SOX 404 internal controls impact, finding auditors are more likely to deem internal controls ineffective when they are unfamiliar with clients.
Appears in Collections: 02 Auditing

Please email if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.