Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/64912

Does Common Ownership Impact Auditor Incentives?

File Size Format  
HARC 2020 paper 244.pdf 273.33 kB Adobe PDF View/Open

Item Summary

dc.contributor.author K.K. Raman
dc.contributor.author Chunlai Ye
dc.contributor.author Lin-Hui Yu
dc.date.accessioned 2019-12-06T18:39:59Z
dc.date.available 2019-12-06T18:39:59Z
dc.date.issued 2019-08-31
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10125/64912
dc.description.abstract Prior research suggests that common ownership (i.e., institutional investors owning significant equity stakes in companies within the same industry) impairs companies’ incentives to compete since owners are less likely to support an aggressive competitive strategy. In this paper, we examine whether common ownership impacts auditor incentives. Using a sample of US firms during the 2003–2017 period, we find that common ownership lowers audit fees and audit effort without impairing audit quality. We perform cross-sectional tests as well as a quasi-natural experiment based on institutional owner mergers to help mitigate concerns about omitted variable bias or reverse causality. Overall, our findings are consistent with the view that common-owners internalize governance externalities and have accumulated more industry-specific monitoring experience, which in turn decreases audit risk.
dc.subject Audit pricing
dc.subject Audit quality
dc.subject Common ownership
dc.title Does Common Ownership Impact Auditor Incentives?
Appears in Collections: 02 Auditing


Please email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.