Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Auditor Skepticism and Client Ill Will

File Size Format  
HARC 2020 paper 212.pdf 347.52 kB Adobe PDF View/Open

Item Summary

Title:Auditor Skepticism and Client Ill Will
Authors:Mary Curtis
Jared Eutsler
Kip Holderness
Jesse Robertson
client ill will
audit quality
auditor-client relationship
Date Issued:30 Aug 2019
Abstract:Professional skepticism is considered an essential component of audit quality. Consequently, research has focused on ways to increase skepticism by identifying factors that either limit or encourage its practice. However, research has yet to explore potential negative consequences of professional skepticism. We conduct two experiments to investigate if high levels of skepticism create ill will in audit clients, and how ill will affects the auditor-client relationship and audit quality. In the first experiment, we find that high skepticism creates ill will in the client, which increases the likelihood the client recommends switching auditors and decreases the amount of evidence provided to the auditor. We find that auditors can ingratiate themselves with the client as an intervention to decrease the development of ill will and mitigate its adverse effects. In our second experiment, we examine if client pressure to persuade the auditor of their accounting position mitigates the relationship between high skepticism and ill will. We find an interaction such that if the evidence does not support the accounting treatment the client recommends, a high level of auditor skepticism does not cause clients to experience as much ill will toward the auditor. We contribute to the literature by investigating a new empirical construct, client ill will, and developing a more nuanced perspective of the interactions between auditors and their clients.
Appears in Collections: 02 Auditing

Please email if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.