Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/64886

How do Auditors Respond to Accounting Restatements? Evidence on Audit Staff Allocation

File Size Format  
HARC 2020 paper 194.pdf 285.44 kB Adobe PDF View/Open

Item Summary

Title:How do Auditors Respond to Accounting Restatements? Evidence on Audit Staff Allocation
Authors:Chien-Min Kevin Pan
Wuchun Chi
Keywords:Restatement
Misstatement
Audit fees
Audit inputs
Date Issued:30 Aug 2019
Abstract:This paper examines how auditors respond to accounting restatements using Japanese audit input data. We find that audit fees, the number of Certified Public Accountant (CPA) licensed staff, and the number of signing partners are higher for firms in the restatement year than the year prior to the restatement. Our results also show that the increase in audit fees and the higher numbers of CPA licensed staff and signing partners persists after the restatement year. Overall, our findings suggest that audit firms charge higher fees and assign more experienced staff in response to accounting restatements, implying that we can attribute part of the increased audit fees to increased efforts, not the risk premium alone. We believe that ours is the first study to document auditors increase the numbers of licensed staff and signing partners in response to their own responsibilities (i.e., a restatement could result from a previously failed audit).
URI:http://hdl.handle.net/10125/64886
Appears in Collections: 02 Auditing


Please email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.