Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Flying under the Radar: Confidential Filings and Pre-IPO Lawsuits
|Title:||Flying under the Radar: Confidential Filings and Pre-IPO Lawsuits|
Naim Bugra Ozel
initial public offerings
|Date Issued:||26 Aug 2019|
|Abstract:||Despite strong incentives to increase visibility and disclosure in advance of initial public offerings (IPOs), prior research finds many firms take advantage of the confidential filing provisions of the JOBS Act of 2012 to obscure their fundraising pursuits. We posit that one potential explanation for this puzzling phenomenon relates to reduced litigation risk, since confidential filing makes IPO activity less salient to the outsiders of the firm. Using a comprehensive sample of lawsuits against IPO firms from 2008 to 2014, we find evidence consistent with this hypothesis. Relative to a matched sample of firms that file their registration publicly, firms that file confidentially under the provisions of the JOBS Act experience 38% fewer lawsuits during the pre-IPO period. Moreover, our findings suggest that filing confidentially is particularly effective in shielding IPO firms from possibly strategic lawsuits by other businesses and from lawsuits that lack legal merit. We show that each lawsuit filed by a business against the IPO firm is associated with more than 4% increase in IPO underpricing. Our findings suggest that an unintended consequence of the confidential filing provision under the JOBS Act is to provide IPO firms a means to reduce litigation risk at the cost of increased information asymmetry.|
|Appears in Collections:||
07 Financial: Disclosure|
Please email firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.