Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Ambidextrous IT Governance Enactment in Healthcare: A Comparison between the Swedish and Ugandan Setting

File Size Format  
0551.pdf 366.67 kB Adobe PDF View/Open

Item Summary

Title:Ambidextrous IT Governance Enactment in Healthcare: A Comparison between the Swedish and Ugandan Setting
Authors:Kizito, Michael
Keywords:IT Governance and its Mechanisms
it governance
resource orchestration
Date Issued:07 Jan 2020
Abstract:IT Governance is advocated as a necessary prerequisite for effective digitalization by research and practice alike. Despite this, there are but few studies of IT Governance in the healthcare sector, and even fewer on the enactment of IT Governance. This paper reports on a comparative case study of a Swedish and Ugandan setting on the enactment of ambidextrous IT governance within healthcare. Ambidextrous IT Governance is perceived as governance designed to balance targets of efficiency and innovation, and the study is informed by the resource orchestration logic. The findings show a set of challenges and opportunities in both settings such as complexity in the sharing of information in the Swedish setting and the possibility to leapfrog in the Ugandan. Furthermore, the ambidextrous balancing point and aspired shift differed significantly between the two settings, where the Ugandan setting wanted to rebalance toward exploitation and the Swedish setting toward exploration. The paper concludes with a discussion and a call for future research on ambidextrous IT Governance.
Pages/Duration:10 pages
Rights:Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Appears in Collections: IT Governance and its Mechanisms

Please email if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons