Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
WRRCTMR No.54 Bromine Chloride: An Alternative Disinfectant to Chlorine
|Title:||WRRCTMR No.54 Bromine Chloride: An Alternative Disinfectant to Chlorine|
|Authors:||Keswick, Bruce H.|
Fujioka, Roger S.
Burbank, Nathan C Jr.
Loh, Philip C.
|LC Subject Headings:||Bromine chloride.|
Disinfection and disinfectants.
Sewage -- Purification -- Chlorination.
Sewage sludge -- Disinfection.
|Issue Date:||May 1977|
|Publisher:||Water Resources Research Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa|
|Citation:||Keswick BH, Fujioka RS, Burbank NC, Loh PC. 1977. Bromine chloride: an alternative disinfectant to chlorine. Honolulu (HI): Water Resources Research Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa. WRRC technical memorandum report, 54.|
|Series/Report no.:||WRRC Technical Memorandum Reports|
|Abstract:||Bromine chloride (BrCl) was evaluated as an alternative to chlorine as a disinfectant of water and waste water by comparing the efficiency of these two chemicals to inactivate type 1 poliovirus seeded in various aqueous solutions. In a nitrogen-free buffer at pH 6.0, the minimum concentration of BrCl required to effectively inactivate poliovirus (4-log reduction after 15 min at 25°C) was 0.15 mg/l, whereas 0.3 mg/l of chlorine was required to accomplish the same effect. The virus inactivating efficiency of BrCl was
not interfered within the range of pH 6 to 1O. Furthermore, the addition of various concentrations of glycine and NH4Cl to the nitrogen-free buffer solutions more effectively interfered with the virus inactivating properties of chlorine than BrCl. To simulate waste water disinfection, 1 to 5 mg/l of BrCl and chlorine were added to activated sludge treated sewage effluent
seeded with poliovirus, mixed well, and titered after 15 min at 25°C. The results show that the inactivating effects of 1, 2, and 3 mg/l dose of both chlorine and BrCl were equivalent and inefficient. However, at a dose of 5 mg/l, BrCl inactivated 5 logs of virus, whereas chlorine inactivated only
2 logs of virus. These results indicate that BrCl should be seriously considered as a potential alternative to chlorine as a disinfectant.
|Sponsor:||U.S. Department of the Interior; Water Resources Research Center, University of Hawaii Grant/Contract No. 14-31-0001-4011, A-053-HI|
|Pages/Duration:||v + 15 pages|
|Appears in Collections:||WRRC Technical Memorandum Reports|
Please contact firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in an alternative format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.