Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Criteria and Recommendations for IS Research that Bridges the Academic-Practitioner Gap

File Size Format  
0687.pdf 534.48 kB Adobe PDF View/Open

Item Summary

Title:Criteria and Recommendations for IS Research that Bridges the Academic-Practitioner Gap
Authors:Wynn Jr, Donald
Williams, Clay
Keywords:Topics in Organizational Systems and Technology
Organizational Systems and Technology
practice-based research, academic-practitioner gap, scholarship
Date Issued:08 Jan 2019
Abstract:Industry practitioners deal with complex and fast-moving information system (IS) related challenges. IS academic researchers generate substantive theoretical outputs dealing with many of these challenges. Unfortunately, practitioners rarely make use of this academic research. This represents a serious gap that has negative consequences for academics and practitioners alike. This paper identifies aspects of the academic-practitioner gap and describes five criteria (value, velocity, visibility, voice, and verifiability) that researchers may use throughout the research process to increase the likelihood of creating research outputs that will be used by practitioners. These criteria are linked to three approaches for conducting research most likely to impact practitioners – direct creation of practitioner content, translation of scholarly research and co-production. We close with specific recommendations for IS academics to overcome the gap.
Pages/Duration:8 pages
Rights:Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Appears in Collections: Topics in Organizational Systems and Technology

Please email if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons