Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Expectation Accuracy, Cost Behavior, and Slippery Prices
|Title:||Expectation Accuracy, Cost Behavior, and Slippery Prices|
resource adjustment costs
show 1 moredemand volatility
|Date Issued:||31 Aug 2018|
|Abstract:||This study investigates the relation between the accuracy of managerial demand|
expectations and cost behavior. Based on a unique dataset of 4,107 firm-year observations from 737 companies in Denmark, this paper first shows that cost stickiness is substantially stronger for unforeseen negative demand shocks than for expected demand shocks, which is in line with the argument that adjustment costs are typically higher when the time horizon for making the adjustments is shorter. Second, we find empirical evidence that omitting selling price changes
can mislead researchers’ inferences about resource adjustments and cost stickiness when sales are used as a proxy for activity level, which is a common practice in the existing literature. Finally, we show a moderating effect of managerial expectation accuracy on the relationship between demand volatility and cost elasticity. This helps reconciling the ongoing debate on whether companies increase or decrease cost elasticity in response to demand volatility.
|Appears in Collections:||
07 Management Accounting|
Please email email@example.com if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.