Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Slipping the Surly Bonds of the Medical/Rehabilitation Model In Expert Witness Testimony
|63.pdf||136.77 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|62.docx||156.58 kB||Microsoft Word XML||View/Open|
|dc.contributor.author||Murphy, Patricia A.|
|dc.identifier.citation||Murphy, P. A. (2004). Slipping the Surly Bonds of the Medical/Rehabilitation Model In Expert Witness Testimony. Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal, 1(1).|
|dc.description.abstract||This essay asserts that the new academic discipline of disability studies challenges the medical/rehabilitation models of disability and that this challenge has an impact on expert witness testimony. This assertion is based on the author’s experience in a civil sexual assault trial involving a male resident of a group home facility assaulted by another male resident of the group home. The author was surprised to find that her status as a visiting professor in the new academic discipline of disability studies trumped the testimony of the clinical expert witnesses, including a licensed psychologist, a behavioral specialist, and a case manager.|
|dc.publisher||University of Hawaii at Manoa -- Center on Disability Studies|
|dc.relation.ispartofseries||vol. 1, no. 1|
|dc.title||Slipping the Surly Bonds of the Medical/Rehabilitation Model In Expert Witness Testimony|
|dc.type||Research Articles and Essays|
|Appears in Collections:||
RDS Volume 1, No. 1|
Please email email@example.com if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.