Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/51964

When are Fair Value Estimates Comparable? Evidence from the SFAS No. 157 Fair Value Hierarchy

There are no files associated with this item.

Item Summary

Title: When are Fair Value Estimates Comparable? Evidence from the SFAS No. 157 Fair Value Hierarchy
Authors: Black, Jonathan
Chen, Jeff
Marc Cussatt
Keywords: SFAS No. 157
fair value hierarchy
accounting comparability
information environment
Issue Date: 31 Aug 2017
Abstract: One motivation for expanding fair value accounting is to improve financial statement comparability by matching the timing of valuation across companies. However, the effect of fair value accounting on comparability also relies on consistent measurement methods and inputs. As the quantity of items reported using fair value estimation expands it is likely that firms will use a larger variety of measurement techniques, which could impede the comparability of fair value estimates across companies. Thus, we investigate whether the difference in exposure to fair value estimates across firms reduces the comparability of these estimates. Due to the increasing discretion in estimates across the SFAS 157 hierarchy of fair value assets, we also predict that inconsistent measurement will reduce comparability more for level 2 and 3 assets relative to level 1 assets. Results from firm-pair regressions provide evidence that firm-pairs with more diverse proportions of assets valued at fair value have less comparable fair value estimates. Furthermore, we find that differences in more discretionary estimates (Level 2 and 3) are more strongly associated with decreases in comparability than differences in less discretionary Level 1 estimates. We extend our main results to two cross-sectional hypotheses, providing evidence that comparability is reduced even further for subsamples where the firm-pairs have the incentive and ability to introduce discretion into fair value estimates. Taken together, these results suggest that standardization of fair value measurement matters for effectively improving comparability through expanded use of fair value estimates.
Description: Inquiries about this document can be made to HARC@hawaii.edu
URI/DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/51964
Appears in Collections:11 Financial: Financial Reporting Quality / Credit Ratings / Earnings Smoothing / Earnings Comparability (FAR3)


Please contact sspace@hawaii.edu if you need this content in an ADA compliant alternative format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.