Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Acquisitions, Earnouts and Financial Constraints: Evidence from SFAS 141 and SFAS141(R)
There are no files associated with this item.
|dc.description||Inquiries about this document can be made to <a href="mailto:HARC@hawaii.edu">HARC@hawaii.edu</a>|
|dc.description.abstract||This paper studies the acquisition strategies of firms in response to different financial reporting incentives. We focus on the use of earnouts following changes to the accounting treatment of contingent consideration following the 2008 introduction of SFAS 141(R). The revised standards require earnout fair value to be recorded at acquisition date, while earnouts under the previous standards were only reported if, and when, they were paid. Our results indicate that earnout usage decreases in response to increased financial reporting costs of contingent liabilities. This decrease is strongest among financially constrained bidders, who are also observed to decrease participation in M&A markets. A Heckman probit model is employed to correct for sample selection bias. The implications of these findings for deal design and success are discussed.|
|dc.subject||Mergers and acquisitions|
|dc.title||Acquisitions, Earnouts and Financial Constraints: Evidence from SFAS 141 and SFAS141(R)|
|Appears in Collections:||
17 Other Research Topics (OTHERS)|
Please email firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.