Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Conditional Conservatism and Labor Investment Efficiency
|Title:||Conditional Conservatism and Labor Investment Efficiency|
Labor Investment Efficiency
|Issue Date:||22 Aug 2017|
|Abstract:||Prior literature documents that asymmetric timely recognition of losses versus gains (also known as conditional conservatism) can induce management to make more efficient investment decisions by mitigating information asymmetry between management and investors and providing early signals about the profitability of projects undertaken. In this paper, we investigate the impact of conservatism on an important investment decision that has been overlooked, namely investment in labor. We find that conservatism is negatively associated with labor investment inefficiency; more specifically, conservatism reduces inefficiency investment practices on the labor market, including over-hiring, under-firing, under-hiring, and over-firing. Our results hold after controlling for managerial ability, corporate governance and other investments.|
|Appears in Collections:||14 Financial: Conservatism (FAR6)|
Please contact email@example.com if you need this content in an ADA compliant alternative format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.