Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Growth Performance and Carcass Quality of Grass-Fed Beef Raised on Tropical Forages/Legumes

File Description SizeFormat 
2016-05-ms-butler_r.pdfVersion for non-UH users. Copying/Printing is not permitted446.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
2016-05-ms-butler_uh.pdfFor UH users only467.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: Growth Performance and Carcass Quality of Grass-Fed Beef Raised on Tropical Forages/Legumes
Authors: Butler, Kayla
Keywords: Carcass quality
Grass-fed beef
Agricultural Tropical forage
Meat quality
Issue Date: May 2016
Publisher: [Honolulu] : [University of Hawaii at Manoa], [May 2016]
Abstract: Most beef producers in Hawaii ship cattle to the continental United States and Canada for feedlot-finishing, slaughtering and processing. Reasons for this include high transportation costs associated with shipping grain and a lack of production and slaughtering capacity in the state.There is a niche market of consumers that prefer grass-fed over grain-fed beef. However, studies have proven variation in growth performance, carcass quality and nutritional value of beef when comparing these production systems. Typically, grass-fed cattle reach slaughter weight slower, have leaner carcasses, and the meat may be healthier from a consumer standpoint. However, little research has been done to evaluate how nutrient content of different species/varieties of tropical grasses and legumes can affect these parameters in cattle grazing on Hawaii pastures.
Two studies were conducted. The objectives of study one were to determine nutrient profiles of guinea grass (GG) and the tropical legume leucaena (L), and to evaluate growth performance and carcass characteristics of steers grazed on these pastures at Ranch A on Hawaii Island. The objective of study two was to compare differences in nutrient profiles of GG and kikuyu grass (KK) due to: grass type (GG vs KK), season (summer vs winter) and ranch location (B vs C vs D vs E) on Hawaii Island.
Nutrient composition of all samples was determined by near-infrared spectroscopy. Variables determined included: percent crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF), ash-free neutral detergent fiber (aNDFom), ash, total digestible nutrients (TDN), relative feed value (RFV), energy for maintenance (NEM, Mcal/kg), and ash-free neutral detergent fiber digestibility (NDFDom). Growth performance and carcass characteristics (hot carcass weight, backfat thickness, rib-eye area, marbling score, USDA quality grade, and Warner-Bratzler shear force) of steers grazed on GG and GL pastures were determined. Chemical composition of rib- eye samples (moisture, fat, protein, ash, and pH) was determined as well.
Higher average daily gain (ADG) and desirable carcass characteristics were found for steers that grazed on GL pastures compared to GG pastures, which can be attributed to L having an overall higher nutrient value (CP 18.8 vs 27.3, ADF 39.2 vs 27.0, aNDFom 51.5 vs 31.5, Ash 16.3 vs 12.3, TDN 52.4 vs 59.6 % of GG vs L, respectively, P<0.05). Cattle grazed on GL pastures had higher average daily gains (0.46 vs 0.62 kg), shortened stay on pasture (707 vs 532 days), and carcasses with higher marbling score (8.96 vs 10.3), thicker backfat (0.38 vs 0.57 cm), and bigger rib-eye size (81.0 vs 87.9 cm2) than GG grazed steers (P<0.05). Rib-eye of GG had higher intramuscular fat content than that of GL (6.77 vs 4.60%, respectively, P<0.05) and GL rib-eyes were found to be less tender than that of GG (4.09 vs 4.99 kg, respectively, P<0.05). In study two, KK grass had a higher nutrient value when comparing GG to KK (CP 12.03 vs 16.6, ADF 40.1 vs 35.4, Ash 12.7 vs 9.4, TDN 54.7 vs 58.8, RFV 90.1 vs 101.2%, NEM 0.22 vs 0.24 Mcal/kg, NDFDom 120h 67.1 vs 72.9%, respectively, P<0.05). Significant differences were also found due to location and season. All summer samples were found to have a higher nutritional value compared to winter samples (P<0.05) and samples collected from Ranch B had the highest nutritional value as well (P<0.05).
When comparing GG to L, L had a higher RFV (101.0 vs 200.5%, respectively, P<0.001) and more TDN (52.4 vs 59.6%, respectively, P<0.001), which resulted in GL steers having higher ADG (0.46 vs 0.62 kg), shortened stay on pasture (707 vs 532 days) and better carcass characteristics (P<0.05). In conclusion, GL pastures produced animals with higher ADG and more desirable carcass characteristics. Results support producers should practice more grass- fed beef production in Hawaii. It is suggested that producers allow cattle to graze mixed legume/forage pastures due to high ADG and desirable carcass characteristics found for GL cattle. Due to differences found for season and ranch location when comparing GG and KK, producers also need to consider variations in pasture nutrient profiles due to location and season in order to make decisions about when environmental conditions are appropriate to take advantage of grass-fed beef production.
Description: M.S. University of Hawaii at Manoa 2016.
Includes bibliographical references.
Appears in Collections:M.S. - Animal Sciences

Please contact if you need this content in an ADA compliant alternative format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.