Argument Alternation and Argument Structure in Symmetrical Voice Languages: A Case Study of Transfer Verbs in Amis, Puyuma, and Seediq
Argument Alternation and Argument Structure in Symmetrical Voice Languages: A Case Study of Transfer Verbs in Amis, Puyuma, and Seediq
Date
2015-12
Authors
Kuo, Cheng-Chuen
Contributor
Advisor
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
[Honolulu] : [University of Hawaii at Manoa], [December 2015]
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
This dissertation investigates argument structure/alternation in symmetrical voice languages based on the study of transfer verbs in three Formosan languages: Amis, Puyuma, and Seediq. The morphosyntax of transfer verbs is carefully examined according to the three-way classification of transfer verbs. With respect to morphological composition, all three languages exhibit a distinction between give/send-type verbs and throw-type verbs. The finding is consistent with the semantic basis of the classification: give/send-type verbs lexicalize caused possession/motion, while throw-type verbs are two-argument verbs with no involvement of causative semantics. The derivational status of Philippinet-type voice marking is established upon scrutiny of the argument structure of Formosan transfer verbs. Most of the transfer verbs undergo argument alternation between the recipient/goal and the transported theme by means of locative/circumstantial voice (LV/CV) marking. Some "transfer verbs," however, do not always allow argument alternation, as a particular voice form of these verbs may involve a thematic role (location/instrument/beneficiary/patient) other than those in a transfer event. Lexical variation in argument alternation restriction is found within "subclasses" of transfer verbs—an observation not predicted by the ditransitivity hierarchy. To account for the absence/presence of transfer interpretation denoted by different voice "forms" of the same root, I argue that symmetrical voice marking interacts with roots and provides a "constructional" meaning. By means of the semantic map, I show that Formosan LV marker is responsible for designating a set of conceptually contiguous thematic roles (goal/recipient/location/patient), whereas the CV marker targets a different set (theme/instrument/beneficiary/stimulus). Finally, I examine whether current generative theories can account for the argument structure of voice-coded verbs in Formosan languages. I first point out the empirical problems of the applicative analyses of Formosan LV/CV verbs. Formal applicative analyses typically assume a pre-existing subcategorization frame of the verb/root. This assumption, however, does not hold in symmetrical voice languages, where roots prove to be category-less (and therefore argument-less). Embracing the exo-skeletal approach, I propose a feature-based analysis: LV and CV verbs contain distinct functional projections (FPs), specified with the event feature [ground] and [cause], respectively. The FP verbalizes the root and introduces the internal argument as a result of feature valuation.
Description
Ph.D. University of Hawaii at Manoa 2015.
Includes bibliographical references.
Includes bibliographical references.
Keywords
Argument Structure,
Formosan Languages$Symmetrical Voice,
Transfer Verbs,
Semantic Map,
Exo-Skeletal Approach
Citation
Extent
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Theses for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (University of Hawaii at Manoa). Linguistics
Table of Contents
Rights
Rights Holder
Local Contexts
Collections
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.