Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
An Examination of Reader Responses to Grawlixes
|2015-05-ma-stout_r.pdf||Version for non-UH users. Copying/Printing is not permitted||680.98 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|2015-05-ma-stout_uh.pdf||For UH users only||724.15 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Title:||An Examination of Reader Responses to Grawlixes|
|Issue Date:||May 2015|
|Publisher:||[Honolulu] : [University of Hawaii at Manoa], [May 2015]|
|Abstract:||Using taboo words is often perceived negatively in polite conversation, and methods are used to substitute for taboo words in media messages to protect vulnerable populations, such as children. Grawlixes are the nonsense symbols (e.g., #@$%*!) used to replace taboo words in written messages. Despite their popularity and common use, there has been a lack of empirical research examining their relation to taboo words. It was found that although participants were able to associate grawlix symbols with taboo word referents, messages with taboo words, grawlixes, or non-taboo words did not differ significantly in perceived negative emotional valence or emotional intensity. The study found limited support that grawlixes have higher recall than non-taboo words, but also found that contrary to predictions, non-taboo words had higher recall than taboo words.|
|Description:||M.A. University of Hawaii at Manoa 2015.|
Includes bibliographical references.
|Appears in Collections:||M.A. - Communicology|
Please email email@example.com if you need this content in an ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.