Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/50813

Articulating social welfare PhD program rubrics toward sustainable assessment

File SizeFormat 
Hong_Morelli_Kishida_2016SocialWork.pdf1.25 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: Articulating social welfare PhD program rubrics toward sustainable assessment
Authors: Hong, Seunghye
Morelli, Paula T.
Kishida, Jennifer
Keywords: Program learning assessment
Institutional learning assessment
Rubrics
Curriculum map
Issue Date: 16 Apr 2016
Citation: Hong, S., Morelli, P., & Kishida, J. (2016, April). Articulating social welfare PhD program rubrics toward sustainable assessment. Poster session presented at the Assessment for Curricular Improvement Poster Exhibit at the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI.
Abstract: The Myron B. Thompson School of Social Work (SW) PhD program at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa currently has 16 students and 10 graduate faculty members. Developing and implementing sustainable PhD assessment plans are necessary to reflect student learning and curriculum improvements. Articulating the PhD program rubrics into a program-level assessment plan is imperative. The SW PhD program has developed seven Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs), assessable outcomes, and a curriculum map. In Fall of 2015, the PhD program committee revisited the SLOs and made revisions in alignment with the sustainable assessment plan for the program as a foundational step for creating program rubrics. The committee developed program rubrics for benchmarks—(a) specialization, (b) comprehensive examination (i.e., dissertation proposal), and (c) final exam (i.e., dissertation defense)—that are tied to the SLOs. The committee began collecting data using developed rubrics in Spring 2016 as a pilot to gain additional clarity on the rubrics in order to make them efficient and manageable as key parts of PhD program curriculum. During the process of developing the rubrics, the PhD committee collaborated to facilitate the assessment planning process. During this assessment process, the committee has utilized existing materials and sources, such as student products (e.g., dissertation proposal), evaluation criteria (e.g., dissertation evaluation), yearly advising sessions, and student reviews materials. This poster presents the strategies utilized in the pilot project as well as lessons learned through the project.
Pages/Duration: 1 page
URI/DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/50813
Rights: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Appears in Collections:Assessment for Curricular Improvement Poster Sessions


Please contact sspace@hawaii.edu if you need this content in an alternative format.

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons