Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Articulating social welfare PhD program rubrics toward sustainable assessment
|Title:||Articulating social welfare PhD program rubrics toward sustainable assessment|
Morelli, Paula T.
|Keywords:||Program learning assessment|
Institutional learning assessment
|Date Issued:||16 Apr 2016|
|Citation:||Hong, S., Morelli, P., & Kishida, J. (2016, April). Articulating social welfare PhD program rubrics toward sustainable assessment. Poster session presented at the Assessment for Curricular Improvement Poster Exhibit at the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI.|
|Abstract:||The Myron B. Thompson School of Social Work (SW) PhD program at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa currently has 16 students and 10 graduate faculty members. Developing and implementing sustainable PhD assessment plans are necessary to reflect student learning and curriculum improvements. Articulating the PhD program rubrics into a program-level assessment plan is imperative. The SW PhD program has developed seven Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs), assessable outcomes, and a curriculum map. In Fall of 2015, the PhD program committee revisited the SLOs and made revisions in alignment with the sustainable assessment plan for the program as a foundational step for creating program rubrics. The committee developed program rubrics for benchmarks—(a) specialization, (b) comprehensive examination (i.e., dissertation proposal), and (c) final exam (i.e., dissertation defense)—that are tied to the SLOs. The committee began collecting data using developed rubrics in Spring 2016 as a pilot to gain additional clarity on the rubrics in order to make them efficient and manageable as key parts of PhD program curriculum. During the process of developing the rubrics, the PhD committee collaborated to facilitate the assessment planning process. During this assessment process, the committee has utilized existing materials and sources, such as student products (e.g., dissertation proposal), evaluation criteria (e.g., dissertation evaluation), yearly advising sessions, and student reviews materials. This poster presents the strategies utilized in the pilot project as well as lessons learned through the project.|
|Rights:||Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)|
|Appears in Collections:||
Assessment for Curricular Improvement Poster Sessions|
Please email firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License