Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Isomorphic Pressures on Institutional Repositories in Japan
|Beamer Isomorphic Pressures on Institutional Repositories in Japan.pdf||551.63 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Title:||Isomorphic Pressures on Institutional Repositories in Japan|
|Keywords:||Supporting Open Scholarship, Open Data, and Open Science, Repositories of high volume and/or complex data and collections Keywords: Instutional Repoitories, Japan, Institutional Isomorphism, Case Study Approach|
|Date Issued:||30 Jun 2017|
|Abstract:||A variety of IRs have appeared in the past two decades, some as responses to the pressures on the economic model of scholarly publishing, and others as a result of the natural evolution of scholarly communication in some disciplines. In 2003, Japanese Universities started their first system of IR. Since then, over the past decade, more than 300 Japanese universities and research institutions have set up repositories and the number of full-text items on repositories has exceeded one million. The purpose of my research is to examine how Japanese institutions have developed and maintained successful IR’s. This qualitative research will use the lens of Institutional Isomorphism (II) as expressed by DiMaggio and Powell (1983). II is the similarity of processes or structures between organizations, and how they are a result of imitation or independent development under similar environments and pressures (Greenwood, 2008, p.15 - 17). Collecting data via interviews at five institutions (the IR Managers) involved with IR development at Japanese institutions, may reveal noticeable patterns or regularities of IR development. A comparative case
study approach will be used to provide a detailed account and cross-case analysis of IRs
|Description:||24x 7 Slide Presentation. 24×7 presentations are 7-minute presentations comprising no more than 24 slides. Similar to Pecha Kuchas or Lightning Talks, these 24×7 presentations will be grouped into blocks based on conference themes, with each block followed by a moderated discussion / question and answer session involving the audience and whole block of presenters. This format will provide conference goers with a fast-paced survey of like work across many institutions, and presenters the chance to disseminate their work in more depth and context than a traditional poster.|
|Appears in Collections:||
Please email firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.