ScholarSpace will be down for maintenance on Thursday (8/16) at 8am HST (6pm UTC)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Design and Deviance: Patent as Symbol, Rhetoric as Metric, Part 2

File SizeFormat 
56Jurimetrics1.pdf2.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: Design and Deviance: Patent as Symbol, Rhetoric as Metric, Part 2
Authors: Colman, Charles E.
Keywords: design
intellectual property
legal history
show 11 morerhetoric

show less
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Jurimetrics
Citation: Colman, C. (2015). Design and Deviance: Patent as Symbol, Rhetoric as Metric-Part 2, 56 Jurimetrics 1 2015-2016
Related To:
Abstract: This project reveals the unrecognized power of gender and sexuality norms in the deep discourse of pivotal American case law on design patents. In Part 1, I showed that late nineteenth-century cultural developments in the urban Northeast gave rise to a stigma surrounding the "ornamental" and "decorative" works under the then-exclusive purview of design-patent protection. Among the politically dominant segments of American society, the creation, appreciation, and consumption of design "for its own sake" grew increasingly intertwined with notions of decadence, effeminacy, and sexual "deviance." In Part 2, I now examine influential design-patent decisions from the 1870s through the 1930s against that cultural backdrop. My close reading of these decisions will demonstrate that federal judges, particularly in pivotal cases decided by the Second Circuit, increasingly used design-patent disputes as a vehicle for the performance and endorsement of gendered values. The resulting doctrine relegated design patents to near-total irrelevance as a viable form of intellectual property protection for a large and crucial portion of the twentieth century.
Pages/Duration: 45 pages
Appears in Collections:Colman, Charles E.

Please email if you need this content in an ADA-compliant format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.