ScholarSpace will be down for maintenance on Thursday (8/16) at 8am HST (6pm UTC)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Design and Deviance: Patent as Symbol, Rhetoric as Metric, Part 2
|Title:||Design and Deviance: Patent as Symbol, Rhetoric as Metric, Part 2|
|Authors:||Colman, Charles E.|
show 11 morerhetoric
|Citation:||Colman, C. (2015). Design and Deviance: Patent as Symbol, Rhetoric as Metric-Part 2, 56 Jurimetrics 1 2015-2016|
|Abstract:||This project reveals the unrecognized power of gender and sexuality norms in the deep discourse of pivotal American case law on design patents. In Part 1, I showed that late nineteenth-century cultural developments in the urban Northeast gave rise to a stigma surrounding the "ornamental" and "decorative" works under the then-exclusive purview of design-patent protection. Among the politically dominant segments of American society, the creation, appreciation, and consumption of design "for its own sake" grew increasingly intertwined with notions of decadence, effeminacy, and sexual "deviance." In Part 2, I now examine influential design-patent decisions from the 1870s through the 1930s against that cultural backdrop. My close reading of these decisions will demonstrate that federal judges, particularly in pivotal cases decided by the Second Circuit, increasingly used design-patent disputes as a vehicle for the performance and endorsement of gendered values. The resulting doctrine relegated design patents to near-total irrelevance as a viable form of intellectual property protection for a large and crucial portion of the twentieth century.|
|Appears in Collections:||Colman, Charles E.|
Please email email@example.com if you need this content in an ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.