Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Chinese "Workers without Benefits"*
|Title:||Chinese "Workers without Benefits"*|
|Authors:||Brown, Ronald C.|
|Publisher:||Richmond Journal of Global law and business|
|Citation:||Brown, R. (2016). Chinese Workers without Benefits. Richmond Journal of Global Law and Business 15(1), 21-54.|
|Abstract:||Millions of workers in China are not afforded the rights and benefits of its labor and employment laws and thus are not "workers with benefits." China's labor reforms and worker "safety net" have come so far in the past 30 years, producing "workers with benefits." Why are there still millions of workers in the urban sector who do not have the protections of these labor and employment law reforms, who are the "workers without benefits," falling outside the labor safety net? They have been called precarious,1 atypical, irregular, contingent, and include casual, temporary, part-time, dispatch, and workers called subcontractors and independent contractors, which may include construction workers, students, domestic workers, and the many other workers in informal employment relationships. They fall outside the legal protections of the labor laws; or, they may be covered, but excluded or exempted or misclassified. This situation of precarious workers occurs not only in China, but globally, and it has not gone unnoticed by the International Labour Organization (ILO).' Labor laws in China began in earnest in 1994 with the Labor Law, which defined labor rights and obligations in somewhat general terms, with local regulations sometimes more specifically supplementing them. This was followed in subsequent years with more specific labor rights and benefit laws, including for workers health and safety, work-related injuries, unemployment insurance, and other social security benefit laws. These laws are tied into and for the benefit of workers in the employment relationship of a labor contract. Outside this relationship is a contract for labor services, which is not eligible for the benefits of the labor laws, but rather is dealt with under the contract law, as a contract of employment, such as an independent con-|
|Appears in Collections:||Brown, Ronald C.|
Please contact firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in an ADA compliant alternative format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.