Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Toward a balanced grammatical description
|Title:||Toward a balanced grammatical description|
|Date Issued:||Dec 2014|
|Publisher:||University of Hawai'i Press|
|Series:||LD&C Special Publication|
|Abstract:||The writer of a grammatical description attempts to accomplish many goals in one complex document. Some of these goals seem to conflict with one another, thus causing tension, discouragement and paralysis for many descriptive linguists. For example, all grammar writers want their work to speak clearly to general linguists and to specialists in their language area tradition. Yet a grammar that addresses universal issues, may not be detailed enough for specialists; while a highly detailed description written in a specialized areal framework may be incomprehensible to those outside of a particular tradition. In the present chapter, I describe four tensions that grammar writers often face, and provide concrete suggestions on how to balance these tensions effectively and creatively. These tensions are:
• Comprehensiveness vs. usefulness.
• Technical accuracy vs. understandability.
• Universality vs. specificity.
• A ‘form-driven’ vs. a ‘function-driven’ approach.
By drawing attention to these potential conflicts, I hope to help free junior linguists from the unrealistic expectation that their work must fully accomplish all of the ideals that motivate the complex task of describing the grammar of a language. The goal of a description grammar is to produce an esthetically pleasing, intellectually stimulating, and genuinely informative piece of work.
|Rights:||Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License|
|Appears in Collections:||
LD&C Special Publication No. 8: The Art and Practice of Grammar Writing|
Please email email@example.com if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.