Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
How to measure frequency? Different ways of counting ergatives in Chintang (Tibeto-Burman, Nepal) and their implications
|11stollbickel.pdf||Smaller file size than originally uploaded, identical content||188.35 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Title:||How to measure frequency? Different ways of counting ergatives in Chintang (Tibeto-Burman, Nepal) and their implications|
|Date Issued:||Aug 2012|
|Publisher:||University of Hawai'i Press|
|Citation:||Stoll, Sabine and Balthasar Bickel. 2012. How to measure frequency? Different ways of counting ergatives in Chintang (Tibeto-Burman, Nepal) and their implications. In Frank Seifart, Geoffrey Haig, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, Dagmar Jung, Anna Margetts, and Paul Trilsbeek (eds). 2012. Potentials of Language Documentation: Methods, Analyses, and Utilization. 90-95. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.|
|Series:||LD&C Special Publication|
|Abstract:||The frequency of linguistic phenomena is standardly measured relative to some structurally defined unit (e.g. per 1,000 words or per clause). Drawing on a case study on the acquisition of ergativity by children in Chintang, an endangered Tibeto-Burman language of Nepal, we propose that from a psycholinguistic point of view, it is sometimes necessary to measure frequencies relative to the length of the time windows within which speakers and hearers use the language, rather than relative to structurally defined units. This approach requires that corpus design control for recording length and that transcripts be systematically linked to timestamps in the audiovisual signal.|
|Rights:||Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike License|
|Appears in Collections:||
LD&C Special Publication No. 3: Potentials of Language Documentation: Methods, Analyses, and Utilization|
Please email email@example.com if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.