Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Three Roles for Statistical Significance and the Validity Frontier in Theory Testing

File Size Format  
paper0705.pdf 2.99 MB Adobe PDF View/Open

Item Summary Lee, Allen Mohajeri, Kaveh Hubona, Geoffrey 2016-12-29T02:07:26Z 2016-12-29T02:07:26Z 2017-01-04
dc.identifier.isbn 978-0-9981331-0-2
dc.description.abstract This study offers a method for empirically testing theories operationalized in the form of multivariate statistical models. An innovation of the method is that it distinguishes testing into three separate forms, “effect testing,” “prediction testing,” and “theory testing,” where statistical significance plays a separate role in each one. In another innovation, the researcher specifies not only his or her desired level of statistical significance, but also his or her desired level of practical significance. Statistical significance and practical significance each serve as a dimension in a two-dimensional table that specifies the rejection region – the region where the researcher can justify the decision to reject the theory being tested. The boundary of the rejection region is the “validity frontier,” which ongoing research may advance so as to reduce the size of the rejection region.
dc.format.extent 10 pages
dc.language.iso eng
dc.relation.ispartof Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.subject theory testing
dc.subject hypothesis testing
dc.subject statistical significance
dc.subject practical significance
dc.subject rejection region
dc.title Three Roles for Statistical Significance and the Validity Frontier in Theory Testing
dc.type Conference Paper
dc.type.dcmi Text
dc.identifier.doi 10.24251/HICSS.2017.691
Appears in Collections: Theory and Information Systems Minitrack

Please email if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons