ScholarSpace will be down for maintenance on Thursday (8/16) at 8am HST (6pm UTC)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Peer-reviewed Brainstorming to Facilitate Large Group Collaboration

File SizeFormat 
paper0085.pdf1.28 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: Peer-reviewed Brainstorming to Facilitate Large Group Collaboration
Authors: Helquist, Joel
Kruse, John
Diller, Christopher
Keywords: brainstorm
group support systems
Issue Date: 04 Jan 2017
Abstract: This paper examines the impact of peer-reviewed brainstorming on the quality of brainstorming ideas. Peer-reviewed brainstorming aims to improve the quality of the brainstorming ideas and reduce the number of noisy comments. A pilot study was conducted that compared traditional, free brainstorming to a peer-reviewed brainstorming process, which requires each idea to be reviewed and edited by peers. The peer-review process did reduce the number of low quality ideas. This process was also rated higher in satisfaction ratings than traditional brainstorming.
Pages/Duration: 9 pages
ISBN: 978-0-9981331-0-2
DOI: 10.24251/HICSS.2017.085
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Processes and Technologies for Small and Large Team Collaboration Minitrack

Please email if you need this content in an ADA-compliant format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.