Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Native Speaker Judgements as Indicators of L2 Oral Proficiency: Redefining the Role of the Native Speaker in Proficiency Guidelines
|Title:||Native Speaker Judgements as Indicators of L2 Oral Proficiency: Redefining the Role of the Native Speaker in Proficiency Guidelines|
|Authors:||Norris, John M.|
|Contributors:||Brown, James D. (advisor)|
University of Hawaii at Manoa. Department of English as a Second Language. (department)
|Abstract:||The current study attempted to clarify the predictive validity ofthe evaluative interlocutor role assigned to native speakers within the ACTFL Guidelines and, more generally, to provide evidence regarding how a rather homogenous group ofnative speakersjudged non-native efforts at communication. The fundamental issue ofinterest to the study was whether or not native speakers of German would agree with each other in rating non-native speech taken from a test based on the AcrFL Guidelines. The aspects of NNS production chosen for rating were a broad range of linguistic characteristics that figure prominently in the ACTFL Guidelines proficiency level descriptors: grammar, pronunciation, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehensibility. In order to further elucidate the extent to which native speakers act in the role assigned to them by the ACTFL Guidelines, their impressionistic reactions to non-native speech were sought through a set ofopenended questions.|
|Appears in Collections:||
Please email email@example.com if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.