Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Student interview for Place-Based WAC/WID writing instruction in Upper Divison English, clip 6 of 14
ENG 470 GB 7.mp4
Not all videos support streaming previews. You will not be able to jump to portions of the video that have not been downloaded (progress shown as a yellow bar).
In cases where streaming is not supported, the full video will be loaded before playing. If your computer is capable of playing the video files, it may be advisable to download using the link below instead of trying to view it in your browser.
|Title:||Student interview for Place-Based WAC/WID writing instruction in Upper Divison English, clip 6 of 14|
|Authors:||Place-based WAC/WID Hui|
writing across the curriculum
writing in the disciplines
Writing Intensive courses
scholarship of teaching and learning
show 42 morewriting pedagogy
general education requirements
kinds of learning
kind of learning
writing to defend significant places
types of reading
writing as a process
scaffolding student success
compiling previous writings
process of editing
cohesion in final paper
peer editing rubric
|Citation:||Borges, Ghialana. 'Student interview for Place-Based WAC/WID writing instruction in Upper Divison English, clip 6 of 14.' Interview with Jim Henry. Scholarspace. Sep. 2015. Web.|
|Abstract:||Brief excerpt from interview: I think this course has made me a stronger writer... In particular, using writing as defending, for instance, this significant place... Using writing to combat and to defend the importance and the significance of this place... in a historical sense all the way to present day... incorporating the different dynamics of all the different types of readings into my paper and also just the whole process of this project... In the end we could put it all together. Although it seems easy to just like take all the papers and put it in one, [but] to make it cohesive and everything you need to do a lot of editing, you need to re-read, peer edit. It was a process. We got into groups of three and we peer-edited... [Candace] had a rubric of what she wanted us to critique and what she wanted us to focus on and make sure our papers had. In the peer editing process we also talked about what they wanna see in my map and what we could do for that as well.|
|Description:||This item includes a segment of a student interview in a Writing Intensive course in Upper Divison English at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa. The interview was conducted in 2014, and in this clip the interviewee is responding to the question '(How) did this course change you as a person, as a writer, as a scholar, if at all?'|
|Rights:||Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States|
|Appears in Collections:||Student: Ghialana Borges|
Please contact email@example.com if you need this content in an alternative format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.