Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Universalizing Core Human Rights in the "New" ASEAN: A Reassessment of Culture and Development Justifications Against the Global Rejection of Impunity
|Title:||Universalizing Core Human Rights in the "New" ASEAN: A Reassessment of Culture and Development Justifications Against the Global Rejection of Impunity|
|Authors:||Desierto, Diane A.|
|Citation:||1 Goettingen J. Int'l L. 77 2009|
|Series:||Goettingen Journal of International Law, Volume 1|
|Abstract:||This paper responds to the defences of "culture" and "development" rights as justifications for exceptionalism in human rights obligations in Southeast
Asia, particularly against the context of the passage of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Charter. Under the new ASEAN
Charter, Member States have the general obligation to abide by the Organizational Principles of "adherence to the rule of law, good
governance, the principles of democracy and constitutional government", as well as "respect for fundamental freedoms, the promotion and protection of
human rights, and the promotion of social justice". More importantly, it is now the specific obligation of ASEAN Member States to "take all necessary
measures, including the enactment of appropriate domestic legislation, to effectively implement the provisions of the Charter and to comply with all
obligations of membership", including the above-stated Organizational Principles.
The paper shows the normative, conceptual, and empirical weaknesses of
the "culture" and "development" justifications for creating exceptions to the
observance and protection of core human rights norms. Assessing the right
to culture as an exception to human rights observance, the paper asserts the
ideological imprecision of the "right to culture" as an exception to human
rights observance, noting that the porous definition of "culture" should not
be equally valued in its assertion against core human rights norms which
form part of general international law (e.g. jus cogens prohibitions, crimes
against humanity, war crimes, egregious violations of human rights,
obligations erga omnes) and which can be modified only by a subsequent
norm of the same character. The cultural exception also suffers from
teleological incoherence, since the protection of core human rights norms
bears a greater immediacy and proximity to human dignity and personhood
- a fundamental value that should be more conceptually valuable than the
porous construct of culture. Turning to the "right to development" as an
exception to human rights observance, the paper contends that there is
empirical uncertainty and/or indeterminacy in the concept of "development"
that undermines its legal-philosophical value as an exception to human
rights observance. Moreover, contrary to the assertions of development
exceptionalism to human rights observance, there is no linearity in the claim
that human rights protection "impedes" development. Rather, as shown in
recent economic analysis, there is a stronger claim for human rights
protection as a necessary precondition for development.
Further reinforcing these refutations of "culture" and "development"
justifications for human rights exceptionalism is, however, the emergence of
a customary international law norm rejecting impunity for serious violations
of human rights (specifically, civil and political rights), which has gained
recognition from the forty-year independent practice (primarily seen in
treaty ratifications and implementation) of Southeast Asian states. Despite
variances in the degree of ASEAN Member States' practices, there is at
least consistent opinio juris that redress for serious human rights violations
should not be met with non liquet in remedial processes, whether domestic
or international. The passage of the ASEAN Charter therefore marks a
convergence of ASEAN towards "universalizing" core human rights norms
as now seen in its Organizational Principles and the new requirements of
ASEAN membership obligations.
|Appears in Collections:||
Desierto, Diane (Former Faculty)|
Please email email@example.com if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.