Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Money Talks: A Comparison of Economics and Psychology Students
|Title:||Money Talks: A Comparison of Economics and Psychology Students|
|Issue Date:||15 Jan 2014|
|Publisher:||University of Hawaii at Manoa|
|Abstract:||The disciplines of Economics and Psychology share one objective in their experiments: predict real behavior. However, each field has its own method of achieving actual behavior in its participants, which is either through hypothetical or actual monetary incentives. Economists believe that the use of real money gives participants motivation to invest more thought into the experiments rather than make arbitrary decisions. On the other hand, Psychologists generally believe that using money distracts participants. Current literature also shows that there have been marked differences seen between economics and Psychology students. The experimenter utilized the Ultimatum Game with both types of students with the conditions of hypothetical and actual payoffs to see if there were any significant differences in behavior based on students' academic background, the payoff structure, or another factor.|
|Rights:||All UHM Honors Projects are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.|
|Appears in Collections:||Honors Projects for Financial Economics and Institutions|
Please contact email@example.com if you need this content in an alternative format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.