Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Investment under uncertainty : application of binomial option analysis to development of geothermal energy in Indonesia

File Description SizeFormat 
uhm_phd_4272_uh.pdfVersion for UH users6.37 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
uhm_phd_4272_r.pdfVersion for non-UH users. Copying/Printing is not permitted6.37 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: Investment under uncertainty : application of binomial option analysis to development of geothermal energy in Indonesia
Authors: Soerjono Indriyanto, Asclepias Rachmi
Advisor: Chakravorty, Ujjayant
Issue Date: 2002
Publisher: University of Hawaii at Manoa
Abstract: Indonesia has identified a large amount of geothermal resource potential throughout the islands. However, geothermal utilization is presently low. One of the main reasons is due to limited government funds to develop the resources. Another contributing factor is the high prices charged by private geothermal electricity producers, which was part of the reason why the government suspended most private geothermal development projects. The common perception blames corruption, collusion and nepotistic behavior of the market participants for this unfortunate situation. This research shows that even if opportunistic behavior is cast away, the present business arrangement corresponds to an incentive system that brings about high geothermal electricity prices. Applying the Real Option Theory reveals that managerial flexibility in the decision-making process of a geothermal project is valuable, since it allows the use of updated information. In contrast to the present ex-ante price determination setting, a possible way to incorporate flexibility is to agree on output price after exploration activities are concluded. Under certain conditions, this ex-post price determination setting may produce a wider range of feasible prices that includes those lower than the ex-ante price. As such, incorporating flexibility into the decision process improves project value and may lower its output price. The research model implicitly assumes the first-best world with respect to the assumptions of symmetric information and a simple self-interest behavior. These two assumptions set the limitation of the model results. In a complex world with incomplete and asymmetric information as well as opportunistic behavior of the market participants, the ex-post price determination is likely to fail due to reciprocal concerns of the parties. A two-phased negotiation system may attenuate the opportunism concerns, while provides assurance that only viable projects can survive.
Description: Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2002.
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 227-235).
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Also available by subscription via World Wide Web
xii, 235 leaves, bound ill. 29 cm
Rights: All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.
Appears in Collections:Ph.D. - Economics

Please contact if you need this content in an alternative format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.