Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Writing Herbert writing Sidney : Mary Sidney Herbert, literary patronage, and early modern textual production
|PHD_ACH.H3_5065_uh.pdf||Version for UH users||9.88 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|PHD_ACH.H3_5065_r.pdf||Version for non-UH users. Copying/Printing is not permitted||9.89 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Title:||Writing Herbert writing Sidney : Mary Sidney Herbert, literary patronage, and early modern textual production|
|Description:||Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Hawaii at Manoa, 2008.|
"Writing Herbert Writing Sidney: Mary Sidney Herbert, Literary Patronage, and Early Modern Textual Production" explores ways in which traditional critical approaches replicate the exclusion of early modern women from public discourse. In her own time, Herbert was recognized as an important literary figure, but her work has been undervalued by scholars who represent it as an extension of her brother's. Herbert wrote more than two-thirds of the poetry in the Sidney Psalmes, a text that served as a model of versification for poets like John Donne, but until the feminist movement of the late twentieth century, Herbert's role in publishing Sir Philip Sidney's poetry, literary theory, and prose fiction overshadowed her own work as a writer and patron for most critics.
Herbert's editorial control and revisions of her brother's texts aroused deep-seated cultural anxieties in some scholars, whose representations of Herbert minimize her achievements and her abilities. This dissertation analyzes constructions of Herbert and Sidney, including their own, to identify rhetorical strategies and critical approaches that either authorize or deny authority to a subject's public speech. The centrality of the single-author paradigm to literary scholarship contributes to under-representation of women's roles in early modern textual production. While gender policing of authorship during this period was strict, women could and did affect textual constructions of meaning in their roles as patrons as well as through their own writing.
One of the first women in early modern England to publish her work under her own name, Herbert modeled ways of circumventing restrictions on women's public discourse. She also helped shape the British literary tradition through her representations of Sidney. As Michel Foucault argues, the figure of "author" as a cultural construct circumscribes textual meaning. Through her use of cultural myth, which Roland Barthes identifies with ideology, Herbert redefined Sidney as a cultural icon, associating his name with the British aristocratic ideal in ways that validated the privilege of the hierarchical class structure. Approaches that analyze the ways in which texts circulate as signs in what Barthes describes as a "second-order signifying system" helpfully complement critical focus on textual production and authorship.
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 253-276).
show 2 moreAlso available by subscription via World Wide Web
276 leaves, bound 29 cm
|Rights:||All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.|
|Appears in Collections:||Ph.D. - English|
Please contact email@example.com if you need this content in an ADA compliant alternative format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.