Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
The Impact of Different Modes of Collaborative Interactions among Peers: Peer Review and Revisions in Electronic vs. Traditional Modes on L2 Writing
|Title:||The Impact of Different Modes of Collaborative Interactions among Peers: Peer Review and Revisions in Electronic vs. Traditional Modes on L2 Writing|
|Abstract:||This study investigates the differences between two writing classes which have the same textbooks, content, and course objectives of academic literacy achievement but have different modes of instruction: technology-enhanced versus traditional. It examined how peer feedback differs in these two contexts and how those differences affect students’ revisions. The data was collected from multiple sources: oral interaction in peer review sessions, written responses, and student and teacher interviews and a classroom observation. The results evidenced that the modes of communication in the form of peer feedback did not have any obstacles for the L2 writings in the on-line class.|
|Appears in Collections:||
Student Work - ELI|
Please email firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.