Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Hinterlands, Urban Centers, and Mobile Settings: The "New" Old World Archaeology from Eurasian Steppe
|Title:||Hinterlands, Urban Centers, and Mobile Settings: The "New" Old World Archaeology from Eurasian Steppe|
show 2 moresocial complexity
|LC Subject Headings:||Prehistoric peoples--Asia--Periodicals.|
|Publisher:||University of Hawai'i Press (Honolulu)|
|Citation:||Honeychurch, W., and C. Amartuvshin. 2007. Hinterlands, Urban Centers, and Mobile Settings: The "New" Old World Archaeology from Eurasian Steppe. Asian Perspectives 46 (1): 36-64.|
|Series/Report no.:||Volume 46|
|Abstract:||Archaeological studies of pastoral nomadic societies have been invigorated by recent collaborative research projects across the Eurasian steppe zone. This research contributes an important comparative perspective on processes of complex sociopolitical organization practiced among mobile groups. This essay employs a novel approach to understanding the organizational techniques and methods of finance that supported large-scale imperial polities of eastern Eurasia, specifically those centered on the Mongolian steppe. Using full-coverage survey data from the northern Mongolian valley of Egiin Gol, we present the results of diachronic spatial and environmental analyses in order to evaluate current models for nomadic political economy. We argue that eastern Eurasian subsistence economics are best understood not as a single "type" of production but as a productive process based on multiresource capacities (agro-pastoral, hunting, gathering, fishing) and the flexibility to readily adjust resource emphasis, degree of mobility, and specialization relative to a changeable environment. We offer a revised model for eastern steppe political integration emphasizing the spatial management of political relationships within a mobile setting. Our essay concludes with a brief overview of the potential for Eurasian steppe archaeology to contribute novel comparative insights for anthropologists studying the diversities and commonalities of complex social organization. KEYWORDS: pastoralism, nomadism, Mongolia, Eurasia, political economy, social complexity, urbanism.|
|Appears in Collections:||Asian Perspectives, 2007 - Volume 46, Number 1 (Spring)|
Please email firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in an ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.