Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Three Competing Research Perspectives for Oceania
|Title:||Three Competing Research Perspectives for Oceania|
|LC Subject Headings:||Oceania -- Periodicals.|
|Publisher:||University of Hawai'i Press|
Center for Pacific Islands Studies
|Citation:||Wood, H. 2006. Three Competing Research Perspectives for Oceania. The Contemporary Pacific 18 (1): 33-55.|
|Abstract:||Three research perspectives are currently competing in Oceania. A disciplinebased perspective still dominates, though ever fewer people believe that disciplines produce superior forms of knowledge. An alternative, interpretation-based perspective is becoming more prominent, but this approach relies on confusing and contradictory claims about how interpretations connect to concrete activities. A practice-based approach seems better able to promote diversity and place-based autonomies in Oceania. Research that focuses on practices avoids the universalizing claims of discipline-based research. By treating cultures as dynamic repertoires of practices, a practice-based approach integrates interpretive and noninterpretive activities within a single research frame. Examples from many researchers, including Epeli Hau‘ofa and Ty Käwika Tengan, illustrate the benefits of a practice-based approach.|
|Appears in Collections:||TCP [The Contemporary Pacific ], 2006 - Volume 18, Number 1|
Please contact email@example.com if you need this content in an alternative format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.