ScholarSpace will be down for maintenance on Thursday (8/16) at 8am HST (6pm UTC)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

“Got Race?” The Production of Haole and the Distortion of Indigeneity in the Rice Decision

File SizeFormat 
v18n1-1-31.pdf129.5 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: “Got Race?” The Production of Haole and the Distortion of Indigeneity in the Rice Decision
Authors: Rohrer, Judy
Keywords: indigeneity
show 1 morecritical race theory
show less
LC Subject Headings: Oceania -- Periodicals.
Issue Date: 2006
Publisher: University of Hawai'i Press
Center for Pacific Islands Studies
Citation: Rohrer, J. 2006. “Got Race?” The Production of Haole and the Distortion of Indigeneity in the Rice Decision. The Contemporary Pacific 18 (1): 1-31.
Abstract: This paper is part of a larger project that explores haole (white people, foreigners) as a colonial form of whiteness in Hawai‘i—as a dynamic social assemblage. Haole was forged and reforged in over two centuries of colonization, and it must be understood through that history. I use the recent Supreme Court decision in Harold F Rice v Benjamin J Cayetano, 528 US 495 (2000), as an entry point into the interrogation of haole. Framed by the dominant discourse, the case appeared to be about Native Hawaiians (asking questions about who they are and what rights they have), and not about haole (assuming there are no questions as to who they are and what rights they have). The Rice case illustrates how Western law renders indigenous claims inarticulable by racializing native peoples, while simultaneously normalizing white subjectivity by insisting on a color-blind ideology. The inherent contradiction in these two positions—race matters /race does not matter—is played out in the frictions surrounding the Rice decision and is evidence of the cracks in the hegemony of Western law that complicate any easy binary of colonizer–colonized. Through an analysis of Rice, I explore how the Western legal framework is set up to accept the teleological narrative of the development, to problematize native identity, and to naturalize white subjectivity. I then broaden the lens to explore the ways Rice points to an epistemological disconnect between Western notions of the production of knowledge and indigenous articulations of the same.
ISSN: 1043-898X
Appears in Collections:TCP [The Contemporary Pacific ], 2006 - Volume 18, Number 1

Please email if you need this content in an ADA-compliant format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.