Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Whose Knowledge? Epistemological Collisions in Solomon Islands Community Development
|Title:||Whose Knowledge? Epistemological Collisions in Solomon Islands Community Development|
|Authors:||Gegeo, David Welchman|
Watson-Gegeo, Karen Ann
show 1 moreSolomon Islands
|LC Subject Headings:||Oceania -- Periodicals.|
|Publisher:||University of Hawai'i Press|
Center for Pacific Islands Studies
|Citation:||Gegeo, D. W., and K. A. Watson-Gegeo. 2002. Whose Knowledge? Epistemological Collisions in Solomon Islands Community Development. The Contemporary Pacific 14 (2): 377-409.|
|Abstract:||We show in this article how modernization, disguised as “community development,”|
continues to fail rural villages in Solomon Islands despite the supposed
movement toward a more people-centered, bottom-up philosophy in development
education and practice. We focus on the case study of a Kwara‘ae (Malaita island)
rural, locally owned and operated project aimed at giving unemployed male youth
a stake in the community and preventing their off-island migration. Successful for
a decade, the project was destroyed by the intervention of a retired government
official who, because of his education, training, and work with outside development
agencies, imposed a modernization framework, including centralization of
leadership and the valuing of Anglo-European knowledge over indigenous knowledge.
While agreeing with the theoretical argument for indigenous knowledge in
development, we argue that it is equally important that development be guided by
people’s indigenous epistemology/ies and indigenous critical praxis for (re)constructing and applying knowledge.
|Appears in Collections:||
TCP [The Contemporary Pacific], 2002 - Volume 14, Number 2|
Please email firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.