Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Imagining the Marshalls: Chiefs, tradition, and the state on the fringes of United States empire
|uhm_phd_4369_r.pdf||Version for non-UH users. Copying/Printing is not permitted||36.02 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|uhm_phd_4369_uh.pdf||Version for UH users||36.02 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Title:||Imagining the Marshalls: Chiefs, tradition, and the state on the fringes of United States empire|
|Authors:||Walsh, Julianne Marie|
|Advisor:||White, Geoffrey M|
show 1 moreCultural anthropology
|Issue Date:||Aug 2003|
|Publisher:||University of Hawaii at Manoa|
|Citation:||Walsh, Julianne Marie (2003) Imagining the Marshalls: Chiefs, tradition, and the state on the fringes of United States empire. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawai'i, United States -- Hawaii.|
|Abstract:||Understandings of the Marshall Islands require attention to the interplay of multiple discourses of tradition, modernity, chiefs, development, and democracy from
multiple sources that critically interact and mutually construct the Marshall Islands. This multi-sited, multi-vocal ethnography explores the reproduction and transformation of historic power relationships between Marshallese chiefs and commoners who incorporate and "indigenize" foreign discourses and resources into culturally informed models and practices of authority. In relationships of unequal power, such as that defined by the Compact of Free Association between the United States and the Republic of the Marshall Islands, dominant global discourses about culture and progress enable both local and transnational
hegemonies. These discourses are contextually analyzed as they are invoked and challenged in Nitijela [parliament] debates, in evaluations of the Compact of Free Association, in elites' autobiographical reflections on Marshallese-American relationships, and in foreign media representations. Historical shifts in the political and economic powers of Marshallese chiefs through three colonial administrations, and the growth of a commoner elite class since World War II further highlight the ways foreign resources are appropriated for specific local purposes that transform understandings of power and authority. With discourse as both object and method of analysis, the agency of local actors is both foregrounded and contextualized. Simplistic characterizations of chiefs, elites, commoners, and foreigners' are complicated through close attention to the ways local loyalties, colonial histories, political rivalries, and global discourses inform and frame expressions of Marshallese identities.
|Rights:||All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.|
|Appears in Collections:||Ph.D. - Anthropology|
Anthropology Ph.D Dissertations
Please contact firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in an alternative format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.