Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

On Defining Species in Terms of Sterility: Problems and Alternatives

File Size Format  
v42n1n2-65-71.pdf 6.97 MB Adobe PDF View/Open

Item Summary Paterson, Hugh 2008-04-07T08:08:26Z 2008-04-07T08:08:26Z 1988
dc.identifier.citation Paterson H. 1988. On defining species in terms of sterility: problems and alternatives. Pac Sci 42(1-2): 65-71.
dc.identifier.issn 0030-8870
dc.description.abstract Despite its historic role as a criterion of species status, intersterility sensu lato is not an acceptable characteristic for delineating the genetic species or field of gene recombination. This conclusion is not new since it is in agreement with Darwin 's views as expressed in Origin of Species (1859). The critical role of sterility in distinguishing between the prevailing genetic concept of species and its rival, the recognition concept, is demonstrated. Factors that may have led to the general acceptance of Wallace's views on speciation, rather than Darwin's, are briefly discussed.
dc.language.iso en-US
dc.publisher University of Hawaii Press
dc.title On Defining Species in Terms of Sterility: Problems and Alternatives
dc.type Article
dc.type.dcmi Text
Appears in Collections: Pacific Science Volume 42, Numbers 1-2, 1988

Please email if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.