Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Explict and implicit stereotype content : the case of gender in academia
|Young Danielle r.pdf||Version for non-UH users. Copying/Printing is not permitted||438.35 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Young Danielle uh.pdf||Version for UH users||453.53 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Title:||Explict and implicit stereotype content : the case of gender in academia|
|Authors:||Young, Danielle Magan|
|Date Issued:||Aug 2011|
|Publisher:||[Honolulu] : [University of Hawaii at Manoa], [August 2011]|
|Abstract:||Women's underrepresentation in the sciences has been ascribed to a variety of causes, including their perceived lack of competence and their abundance of warmth. The stereotype content model (SCM) theorizes that warmth and competence are universal aspects of social cognition and that these two factors underlie stereotypes held about outgroups. Three studies were conducted using subgroups of gender in the sciences as a framework to extend the use of SCM, using both explicit and implicit methods. Study 1 established that female professors in the sciences are perceived as less competent and more warm than their male counterparts. Study 2 replicated the findings from Study 1, and attempted to connect explicit SCM to implicit measures. Study 3 attempted to extend findings from the previous studies using an experiment to investigate whether explicit and implicit SCM can predict behavior and behavioral intentions.|
|Description:||Ph.D. University of Hawaii at Manoa 2011.|
Includes bibliographical references.
|Appears in Collections:||
Ph.D. - Psychology|
Please email email@example.com if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.