Focus particles at syntactic, semantic and pragmatic inferfaces : the acquisition of "only" and "even" in English

Date
2011-08
Authors
Kim, So Young
Contributor
Advisor
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
[Honolulu] : [University of Hawaii at Manoa], [August 2011]
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
The present study aims to investigate how English-speaking children comprehend sentences with a focus particle such as only or even. Experiments 1 and 2 provided novel results regarding how English-speaking children interpret sentences containing only in terms of scope assignment and pragmatic inferencing. Children were able to employ discourse information to infer contrast information. However, they made errors by adopting a strong object-focused scope analysis regardless of the syntactic position of only (e.g., Only Red Bear bought a balloon or Red Bear bought only a balloon). For direct experimental investigation into a more detailed picture of children's grammatical restrictions on the scope of only, sentences containing only preceding two nouns connected by the preposition about (e.g., Toto bought only a book about Mickey Mouse) or the preposition to (e.g., Toto brought only a book to Mickey Mouse) were employed. Children were more likely to associate only with the second noun (e.g., Mickey Mouse) than with the first noun (e.g., a book). The results from Experiments 1 and 2 indicate that children have adult-like pragmatic inferencing in computing contrast information but make syntactic errors by identifying the last nouns as focus. Experiments 3 and 4 explored English-speaking children's construal of sentences containing even in terms of pragmatic inferencing, that is, scalar implicature. Overall, the children succeeded in understanding affirmative even sentences (e.g., Even Larry was able to reach the cookie or Bear was able to reach only the vanilla cookie) and negated even sentences (e.g., Even Larry was not able to reach the cookie or Bear was not able to reach only the vanilla cookie) only slightly less than half the time. From a detailed examination of the results, a general picture emerged of two child groups with different capabilities for computing scalar implicature. The first group consistently failed for both sentence types with even; the second group consistently succeeded for both sentence types with even.
Description
Ph.D. University of Hawaii at Manoa 2011.
Includes bibliographical references.
Keywords
English
Citation
Extent
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Theses for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (University of Hawaii at Manoa). Linguistics.
Table of Contents
Rights
Rights Holder
Local Contexts
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.