Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/101614

Exclusion, violence, and reference : a poststructuralist reading of the classical Nyāya and Buddhist pramāṇa debates

File Description Size Format  
Donahue_Amy_r.pdf Version for non-UH users. Copying/Printing is not permitted 2.47 MB Adobe PDF View/Open
Donahue_Amy_uh.pdf Version for UH users 2.54 MB Adobe PDF View/Open

Item Summary

dc.contributor.author Donahue, Amy Kali
dc.date.accessioned 2016-03-09T19:32:57Z
dc.date.available 2016-03-09T19:32:57Z
dc.date.issued 2011-08
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10125/101614
dc.description Ph.D. University of Hawaii at Manoa 2011.
dc.description Includes bibliographical references.
dc.description.abstract The dissertation draws on the work of contemporary poststructuralist queer, feminist, and postcolonial theorists to set the ground for a poststructuralist reading of the classical Nyāya and Buddhist Pramāṇa debates. In the process, it problematizes comparative philosophy's currently prevalent, colonially overdetermined framing of these debates, and shows how both Buddhist and Nyāya epistemologies and semantic theories offer resources that poststructuralists can use to bolster critiques of modern, liberal epistemological and semantics assumptions, and develop practices of judgment and reason that regulate or correct structuralists' distinctive philosophical errors. It specifically problematizes modern assumptions that individuals are passively continuous with unproblematically intuited and generally representative normative epistemological subjectivities, and that to know, individuals must appear as representative members of already established subject categories. The dissertation uses the Buddhist textual tradition's "no-self" metaphysics and "exclusion of the other" semantics, as they have been developed in Buddhist pramāṇavāda, to situate poststructuralist and anti-essentialist philosophies in a broader historical and cultural context, and shows how even the non-modern Nyāya realist tradition offers resources that could benefit poststructuralist feminist, gender, and cultural theorists who now seek to imagine alternatives to modern epistemological frames. Simultaneously, it draws on the work of Subaltern Studies historian, Partha Chatterjee, to correct what Nietszche called philosophers' congenital defect--a lack of historical perspective--by situating the currently prevalent comparative philosophical framing of the Nyāya-Buddhist debates in the context of South Asia's postcolonial history, with specific attention paid to the emergence of a modern Indian middle class national subject. In addition, because comparative philosophers customarily read South Asia's epistemological and logical traditions through an analytic philosophical lens, this scholarship is among the first to initiate mutually informed conversation between poststructuralist feminist and queer theories of subjectivity and knowledge, including the work of theorists such as Judith Butler, Gayatri Spivak, and Michael Warner, and twentieth century analytic epistemology and philosophy of language, including WVO Quine's naturalized epistemology and Bertrand Russell's theory of definite descriptions.
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher [Honolulu] : [University of Hawaii at Manoa], [August 2011]
dc.relation Theses for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (University of Hawaii at Manoa). Philosophy.
dc.subject Nyāya
dc.title Exclusion, violence, and reference : a poststructuralist reading of the classical Nyāya and Buddhist pramāṇa debates
dc.type Thesis
dc.type.dcmi Text
Appears in Collections: Ph.D. - Philosophy


Please email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.