Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
A computational investigation of relational reasoning in nonhuman animals
|Ciraolo_Margeaux_r.pdf||Version for non-UH users. Copying/Printing is not permitted||391.34 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Ciraolo_Margeaux_uh.pdf||Version for UH users||402.51 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Title:||A computational investigation of relational reasoning in nonhuman animals|
|Authors:||Ciraolo, Margeaux Faye|
|Issue Date:||May 2012|
|Publisher:||[Honolulu] : [University of Hawaii at Manoa], [May 2012]|
|Abstract:||Since Darwin (1859) suggested that all animals share a common ancestry, researchers have attempted to assess how the divergence between human and nonhuman animal biology and cognition came about. Animals have a large repertoire of physical and behavioral adaptations that have afforded them the ability to overcome myriad obstacles to their existence. On the behavioral level, these adaptations are as diverse as the species that exhibit them. One merely has to select an animal species at random and do a cursory investigation in order to find many complex behaviors which make that animal a perfect fit for the environment that it inhabits. However, it is possible that the high degree to which an animal is adapted to its environment may limit that animal's ability to employ flexible behavior. For example, the digger wasp has a highly stereotypical set of behavioral steps for readying a nest. If any one of these steps is disrupted in the process of nest creation, the digger wasp will not alter its behavioral program, even if doing so would ensure the life of its offspring (Fabre, 1919). In short, the digger wasp lacks flexibility in its behavioral routine. Indeed, many animal species display rigidity in their behavior. Humans, on the other hand, appear to have much more control of their behavior as well as a flexibility that has allowed them to manipulate and change their environment. The mechanism that underlies this ability may be at the heart of what makes human and nonhuman animal cognition so qualitatively different.|
|Description:||M.A. University of Hawaii at Manoa 2012.|
Includes bibliographical references.
|Appears in Collections:||M.A. - Psychology|
Please contact firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in an ADA compliant alternative format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.