ScholarSpace will be down for maintenance on Thursday (8/16) at 8am HST (6pm UTC)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Variable buoyancy control for a bottom skimming autonomous underwater vehicle
|Sylvester_Anthony_r.pdf||Version for non-UH users. Copying/Printing is not permitted||3.45 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Sylvester_Anthony_uh.pdf||Version for UH users||3.48 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Title:||Variable buoyancy control for a bottom skimming autonomous underwater vehicle|
|Authors:||Sylvester, Anthony Harold|
|Issue Date:||Dec 2014|
|Publisher:||[Honolulu] : [University of Hawaii at Manoa], [December 2014]|
|Abstract:||A variable buoyancy system (VBS) is a critical component that is widely used to achieve controlled operation of an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV). In this thesis two on/off feedback controllers are presented that utilize data averaging and model-based estimation to offset the effects of sensor noise and achieve precise control of the VBS developed for a prototype AUV. Operation of the prototype bottom skimming AUV requires a constant reaction force between the seabed and the vehicle. While performing a mission, variable seafloor topography and a changing payload weight requires the use of a VBS to regulate the reaction force. One trait that made development of the VBS system a challenging problem is the presence of sensor noise that could not be mitigated with hardware solutions. The software solutions implemented here needed to minimize any time delays in their response that could cause destabilization when coupled with the system's fast on/off actuation.|
It was discovered that both of the presented controllers function under these conditions, but the model-based controller provides more precise control of the system. The data averaging controller was able to regulate the buoyancy of the system to within 5.0 pounds of the commanded setpoint, while the model based controller was able to regulate the buoyancy to within 1.25 pounds of the desired setpoint, an improvement in performance by a factor of 4. Presented here is the development and comparison of these two control algorithms based on both simulation results and field experiments conducted in a coastal environment.
|Description:||M.S. University of Hawaii at Manoa 2014.|
Includes bibliographical references.
|Rights:||All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.|
|Appears in Collections:||M.S. - Mechanical Engineering|
Please email firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in an ADA-compliant format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.