Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

The Failure of Agricultural Policy Reform in Neoliberal Japan: The 2007 Multi-Product Management Stabilization Plan

File Description Size Format  
Miyake Yoshitaka r.pdf Version for non-UH users. Copying/Printing is not permitted 2.46 MB Adobe PDF View/Open
Miyake Yoshitaka uh.pdf Version for UH users 2.48 MB Adobe PDF View/Open

Item Summary

dc.contributor.advisor McDonald, Mary Miyake, Yoshitaka 2015-10-02T20:49:07Z 2015-10-02T20:49:07Z 2014-08
dc.identifier.isbn 9781321463453
dc.description PhD University of Hawaii at Manoa 2014
dc.description Includes bibliographical references (leaves 246–259).
dc.description.abstract This dissertation is a geography of a failed attempt to change state-society relations in Japanese agriculture, examining a policy that tried to require family farms to become corporate entities. The study traces the rationale for state neoliberalism in Japanese agriculture, the particular reform aimed at the practices of rural communities, and the fate of that policy. Neoliberalism is a range of economic policies favoring free markets, de-coupling from state support, and privatization. Japanese agriculture became a target of neoliberal thinkers because sub-sectors rely on state protections and farm scale and land use are thought inefficient. Anticipating that Japanese agriculture would face wider import streams and lower rice subsidies, neoliberal politicians adopted a 2007 national measure known as the Multi-Product Management Stabilization Plan, Hinmoku Ōdanteki Kei'ei Antei Taisaku. This "Multi-Product Plan" was neoliberal in that it declared only core farmers and Cooperative Farming above a certain size would be eligible for future subsidies, and tried to develop these bodies into profitable operations. The plan required Cooperative Farming land pools to rationalize and incorporate the management of small rice farmers. Small producers could not otherwise remain eligible for subsidies. I investigated how the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Forestry (MAFF) rolled out the Multi-Product Plan, how farmers tried to consolidate their management under the Multi-Product Plan; how farmers struggled with the plan in practice; and how politicians, agents, and researchers evaluated the plan's fit with the practices of farmers. Methods included interviews with staff in government agencies from national to local scales, and with leaders of rural communities. The Tōhoku Region was the site of the case study owing to its high dependency on rice farming. I interviewed staff of governments and related agencies across the six prefectures of that region. To understand the fit of the plan with local production and farmers' evaluation of the Multi-Product Plan, I chose Daisen City in the Senboku Region, Akita Prefecture, as a focus. My research found that the Multi-Product Plan could not succeed locally, continue politically, nor restructure Japanese agriculture. Farmers derailed Japan's developmental neoliberal policy in this instance.
dc.format.extent xv, 262 leaves
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher [Honolulu] : [University of Hawaii at Manoa], [August 2014]
dc.relation Theses for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (University of Hawaii at Manoa). Geography.
dc.rights All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.
dc.subject neoliberalism
dc.subject government policies
dc.subject governance of globalizing agriculture
dc.subject Japanese agriculture
dc.subject agricultural economics
dc.subject international negotiations
dc.subject Japan
dc.subject Tohoku prefectures
dc.subject Daisen city
dc.subject agricultural policy
dc.title The Failure of Agricultural Policy Reform in Neoliberal Japan: The 2007 Multi-Product Management Stabilization Plan
dc.type Thesis
dc.type.dcmi Text
dc.contributor.department Geography and Environment
local.thesis.degreelevel PhD
Appears in Collections: Ph.D. - Geography

Please email if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.