| dc.contributor.author |
Kapser, G. |
en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2009-06-24T00:39:43Z |
en_US |
| dc.date.available |
2009-06-24T00:39:43Z |
en_US |
| dc.date.issued |
2000 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation |
Kapser, G. (2000). Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development (NFLRC NetWork #19) [PDF document]. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10125/8955 |
en_US |
| dc.description |
NW19 |
en_US |
| dc.description.abstract |
An increasing body of research examines the development of L2 learners' pragmatic ability (cf. reviews by Kasper & Schmidt, 1996; Bardovi-Harlig, 1999a; Kasper & Rose, 1999). While some earlier longitudinal studies chart observed acquisitional patterns descriptively without relating them to an explanatory framework of second language development (e.g., Ellis, 1992; Sawyer, 1992), other investigations are explicitly guided by - in the rare case, even designed to test - theoretical approaches to L2 learning. Since a fair amount of research under different theoretical orientations now exists, it is timely to take stock of what these approaches have contributed to our understanding of L2 pragmatic development and - not unlike the tenure process at some North American universities - assess their 'future value.' |
en_US |
| dc.publisher |
Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
pragmatics |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
pragmatic development |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
second language |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
pragmatics |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
language instruction |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
language teaching |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
foreign language |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Paper |
en_US |
| dc.type.dcmi |
Text |
en_US |