Audit Partner Identication, Assignment, and the Labor Market for Audit Talent

Date
2019-08-14
Authors
Deng, Mingcherng
Kim, Eunhee
Ye, Minlei
Contributor
Advisor
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
Conventional wisdom suggests that partner identification disclosure can improve audit quality, because it may enhance transparency and individual accountability. Building on a two-period matching model, we argue that the disclosure may distort partner-client assignment - which affects audit quality and/or audit fees - because the disclosure can inform the labor market for audit talent. In a centralized assignment in which an audit firm assigns partners to clients, we find that with the disclosure, audit firms may distort partner assignment - at the expense of lower audit quality - in order to dampen partners' career advancement. In a decentralized assignment in which partners directly bid for clients, the disclosure gives rise to low-balling in the first-period, because partners aggressively lower the audit fees to maximize their career advancement. Our findings identify unintended consequences of audit partner identification disclosure and provide economic reasons for the mixed empirical findings.
Description
Keywords
audit partner identification, assignment, audit quality, audit fee
Citation
Extent
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Table of Contents
Rights
Rights Holder
Local Contexts
Collections
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.