Edifices: A Critique of Home Management.
Edifices: A Critique of Home Management.
Date
2018-05
Authors
Koch, Ryan E.
Contributor
Advisor
Department
Political Science
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
This dissertation is a critique of economics. It approaches this science as a cultural inheritance that is heavily invested
in geometric scalability. My analysis is provoked by the premise of Xenophon’s play, Oeconomicus, in which Socrates
asks if household management is like other arts where its knowledge is applicable generally. In other words, if I know
how to manage my house do I not know how to manage another’s? Taken together with another concept manifest in
this play- that the excellence of economics is to “grow the household”- I understand contemporary economic theory,
such as neoliberalism or capitalism, as consonant with some of the earliest concepts of our term economics.
Where our word economics comes to us from the Greek roots oikos nomos, meaning home management, I argue that
contemporary critiques of political economy share a common denominator with their objects of protest: codes,
perfection and interchangeability. The operative presuppositions are that the whole of society is family and that the
nation is home. All such economic theory purports to know how others should manage their homes. I argue that the
preoccupation with other homes obscures the way particular homes are folded into the political. I build my case by
showing how geometry is reflected in social, domestic and subjective experience. In so doing, I draw out a contrast
between home and politics in which the former is a realm of inexhaustible difference and the latter is a social will to
sameness, equality, or at the very least, minimal difference.
This analysis makes a philosophical argument against ontological sameness. As far as that argument succeeds, it
follows that demographic politics, policy and thought are all fundamentally violent. I then proceed to theorize
homemaking using non-geometric philosophies of difference. I draw from Confucianism, phenomenology,
poststructuralism and biology to argue against an epistemological embrace of perceiving sameness. At the same time,
I attempt to portray the home not only as a point of access for all things political, but also, as scale of life in which
sovereignty is contiguous to agency.
Description
Keywords
Phenomenology,
Economics,
Confucianism,
Structuralism
Citation
Extent
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Table of Contents
Rights
All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.
Rights Holder
Local Contexts
Collections
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.