Verification Services and Financial Reporting Quality: Assessing the Potential of Review Procedures

Date
2018-07-24
Authors
Badertscher, Brad
Kim, Jaewoo
Kinney, William
Owens, Ed
Contributor
Advisor
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
Are financial statement reviews, which are limited to primarily analytical procedures and inquiries, a cost-effective verification service for some firms? The answer is important for owner/managers considering reviews as well as investor/lenders, regulators, and those interested in effective verification mechanism design. Using data from U.S. private companies choosing to have financial statements compiled, reviewed, or audited, we calculate four model-based financial reporting quality proxies and, to reflect broader economics, the cost of debt and verification fee estimates. Consistent with application of prescribed verification procedures, we find both reviews and audits yield significantly better reporting quality scores and lower cost of debt than zero-verification compilations. However, model-based reporting quality scores of reviews and audits are indistinguishable statistically, on average. Regarding broader economics, we find that relative to compilations, reviews yield more than half the added interest rate benefit associated with an audit, at considerably less than half the added cost. Overall, our results suggest reviews may provide a cost-effective verification alternative to audits, and the potential of analytical procedures warrants more attention by audit researchers and regulators.
Description
Keywords
economics of verification, financial reporting quality, cost of debt, confirmatory data analytics
Citation
Extent
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Table of Contents
Rights
Rights Holder
Local Contexts
Collections
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.